|
Has anyone in this mailing list run tests comparable to the
tests Suresh using? If so, does anyone see this kind of
problem? We had tested LVS with 400 new connections/s for
two weeks and not have this problem.
At 04:26 PM 3/15/00 -0800, Suresh wrote:
>There is nothing else running on this machine apart from LVS and ssh.
>
>Suresh
>
>
>On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Wayne wrote:
>
> > This is probably due to some other process running on your
> > box that has memory leak. LVS kernel itself would not have
> > that kind problem. What kind of processes do you have on the
> > system?
> >
> > At 01:13 PM 3/15/00 -0800, Suresh wrote:
> > >I have LVS 0.9.7 in use and have some questions re: memory
> > >usage.
> > >
> > >For the last 3 days, it is using all of the available 256M of memory. I
> > >looked for a correlation with the number of active/inactive connections,
> > >and couldn't find one. Is there some thing else I am missing?
> > >
> > >Our peak active connections are about 1000 on 4 real web servers, and off
> > >peak about 500 on each web server. I would expect IPVS memory usage to
> > >vary by # of connections.
> > >
> > >The lvs was compiled with 2^16 connections, and runs in VS-DR mode.
> > >
> > >Thanks for any pointers.
> > >
> > >Suresh
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
|
