|
Hello,
On Thu, 18 May 2000, Madhav wrote:
> > If this is only a delay what about DNS or IDENT problems?
> > Could be that the IDENT protocol used from the mailers causing
> > the problems? If Yes, You have to stop using IDENT. The LVS >HOWTO
> > includes information about the IDENT problems. If this is not
> I just checked the LVS-HOWTO it is a very big doc. I am going to look into
> it. Thanks.
> > the problem you have to show us a picture of your devices, IPs,
> > routes, etc.
> Here is the picture of my LVS-NAT
> -----------
> | |
> | client | if client IP is 172.16.1.4 then it
> is very slow
> |________| if it is 172.16.31.74 then it is very
> fast.
> |
> |
> Virtual IP(172.16.31.71) (eth0 alias)
> ___________________________________________________________________ LAN
> ____|_____
> _____|_____
> | | (director has 2 NICs)
> | | (director has 2 NICs)
> | director1 | eth0:172.16.31.72 |
> director2 | eth0:172.16.31.73
> |__________| eth1:10.1.10.100
> |__________| eth1:10.1.10.50
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> HUB ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> | |
> | |
> | |
> ____________ ____________
> | | | |
> | realserver1 | | realserver2 |
> |____________| |____________|
> 10.1.10.25 10.1.10.26
>
> Hope this helps to help me.
Did you stopped IDENT protocol in qmail on all real servers.
There was a thread with subject "poor performance using hidden arp method"
from 25-MAR where the solution was proposed (I didn't tested qmail). It
seems that -R option to tcpserver disables IDENT usage. If this is not
an IDENT or DNS problem I can't find another problem (Of course,
I don't understand well the picture, it is so broken).
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <uli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
|
