Re: lvs vs bigip.

To:	Jeremy Johnson <jjohnson@xxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: lvs vs bigip.
Cc:	Jeremy Hansen <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, tc lewis <tcl@xxxxxxxxx>, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From:	Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 01 Jun 2000 18:40:48 -0400

Jeremy Johnson wrote:

> There is only one suggestion..

> I don't use wlc anymore but when
> I was, as soon as I rotated a new box into the cluster (we have around 900
> SSL sessions per machine on average) the new box got ALL the new traffic..

sorry, my last reply could be interpreted as the problem was fixed, clearly it
isn't

Joe
-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center, 
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
lvs vs bigip., tc lewis Re: lvs vs bigip., Jeremy Hansen Re: lvs vs bigip., tc lewis Re: lvs vs bigip., Jeremy Hansen Message not available Re: lvs vs bigip., Jeremy Johnson Re: lvs vs bigip., Joseph Mack Re: lvs vs bigip., Jeremy Johnson Re: lvs vs bigip., Joseph Mack <= Re: lvs vs bigip., Horms Re: lvs vs bigip., Joseph Mack

Previous by Date:	Re: lvs vs bigip., Jeremy Johnson
Next by Date:	Re: load balance web site, Horms
Previous by Thread:	Re: lvs vs bigip., Jeremy Johnson
Next by Thread:	Re: lvs vs bigip., Horms
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]