LVS
lvs-users
[Top] [All Lists]
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org
<prev [Date] next> <prev [Thread] next>

Re: turbolinux vs. lvs

from [Joseph Mack] [Permanent Link]
To: Julian Anastasov <uli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: turbolinux vs. lvs
Cc: tc lewis <tcl@xxxxxxxxx>, Jure Pecar <pegasus@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 07:29:40 -0400 (EDT) 
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Julian Anastasov wrote:

>       Folks, it is mentioned in the web site :) The only one
> I know:
> 
>       
> http://www.progressive-comp.com/Lists/?l=linux-virtual-server&r=1&w=2#linux-virtual-server

This question gets asked so often, it deserves an entry in the HOWTO

Joe

--
Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Port 0 not support non-persistent, Julian Anastasov
Next by Date:  Re: ipvs-0.9.13 works with 2.2.16, Wenzhuo Zhang
Previous by Thread:  Re: turbolinux vs. lvs, Julian Anastasov
Next by Thread:  Can LVS box route all packets, both ways?, Peter C. Nikolaidis
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]