LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Ultramonkey is sweet!

To: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Ultramonkey is sweet!
Cc: Linux Virtual Server MList <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Jeremy Hansen <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 03:24:27 -0400 (EDT)
This would seem to make sense.  The smtp feature I believe is a part of
ESMTP standard.  I wish there was a way to turn that off.  I guess I could
try 6.0 and see if I get the same behavior.

I starting using ab (Apache Benchmark) suggested by tc lewis and it seems
to give me the results I would expect from lvs.

Single machine doing 150 threads and 1000 fetches using ab results in
about 300 connections per second, over lvs across three machines results
in about 1200 - 1500 connections per second consistantly.  Using http_load
produced completely unstable numbers.

-jeremy

> 
> My understanding is that Netscape uses - forgive the terminology -
> persistent HTTP connections. That is if Netscape opens up a connection to a
> site and needs to suck down 10 URLs then this may be done over a single TCP
> connection, much in the same way that cached SMTP sessions work with
> sendmail (and other MTAs). Would this explain the problem?
> 
> 
> 

-- 

http://www.xxedgexx.com | jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>