On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Ryan Hulsker wrote:
> > Yes but it is executed once only, before the interfaces come up, so
> > it is not able to set interfaces to be hidden, as the appropriate
> > proc entries don't exist yet.
>
> net.ipv4.conf.all.hidden = 1
> net.ipv4.conf.default.hidden = 1
>
> These seem to do it for me. The default for any new interfaces coming
> up is to make them hidden, which means all your interfaces are always hidden
> including lo. This is not ideal, but I have yet to see it cause a problem
> in my configuration. Can anyone think of any reason why this is not a good
> idea?
even your normal eth0 and lo? doesn't that cause problems? eth0 would
need to respond to arps to get any traffic, no?
-tcl.
|