lvs-users
|
To: | Tim Burke <burke@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "David D.W. Downey" <qixo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Problems with LVS under Red Hat Linux 6.2 |
Cc: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
From: | Wayne <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 20 Jun 2000 13:57:08 -0700 |
I thought in the persistent mode, the connection get closed sooner than 20 minutes -- or the persistent table drops the entry before 20 minutes (tunable parameter). It truly depends on how long do you think long enough to consider the user is inactive. At 04:30 PM 6/20/00 -0400, Tim Burke wrote: >I've encountered scenarios where our router closed inactive connections >after 20 minutes idle time. Diagnosing this was not pleasant. Not sure >if you could be hitting the same problem. > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Problems with LVS under Red Hat Linux 6.2, Tim Burke |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: using sysctl.conf to set hidden interfaces, Ryan Hulsker |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Problems with LVS under Red Hat Linux 6.2, Tim Burke |
Next by Thread: | Question on Backup node running pulse, Kelly Sauke |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |