|
Pietro Ravasio wrote:
>
>
> It is EXACLTLY the same problem I have: nanny+ipvsadm work just fine with
> http and ftp, but don't seem work with any other port I can have service
> listening to (for example: an application gateway listening on 5555port
> (tcp) or an UDP server listening on 10000 port). Every time I start
> "pulse", ipvsadm works fine with http and ftp, but I've got to manually add
> real server for any other port (ipvsadm -a -t virtual_server_IP -r
> real_server_ip m ).
Hummm. First I've heard of this. I personally never tried to use
piranha against cvs but it should work. Since a udp server
cannot be tested via just a connect (since it's connectionless),
you do have to perform some sort of send and/or expect test that
works with a udp server. And, unfortunately, right now that
test is limited to test type data.
I have tested a whole range of ports. It sounds like you're
saying that nanny handles the testing but not the automatic
ipvsadm calls. We'll look into this.
We just posted new RPMs, in which the I/O logic was changed.
Could you test them and see if they have the same problem, or if
they reduce the logging output? If you do experience the same
problems, could you log them into http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/
please? It helps emensely and it will ensure tracking.
Thanks
--
Keith Barrett
Red Hat Inc. HA Team
kbarrett@xxxxxxxxxx
|
