LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: my progress

To: Michael McConnell <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: my progress
Cc: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 06:48:50 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Michael McConnell wrote:

> Ok so I've been making some progress, I've managed to load balance the
> default service of apache, but I can't seem to get Virtual Hosts to work
> worth a damn.
> 
> I see you said that
> 
> NameVirtualHost 10.75.1.11:80
> <VirtualHost 216.45.234.12>
> ServerName = host name of LVS (in my case yoggy.vocalcommerce.com)
> 
> I'm continue to experiment with a few different settings in regards to this.
> What it seems your also saying is that the ServerName variable should be set
> to the name of the LVS ???
> 
> I don't quite understand how this works, how will apache know that the
> NameVirtualHost is assigned to the VirtualHost varible? Does it function in
> a relative list or something?

this is going to be a continual nightmare to maintain. If you used VS-DR
(which you can do with NT real-servers), then you'll use the same
httpd.conf on the realservers as you would a stand-alone httpd machine,
and all httpd.confs will be the same (and the load on the director will be
much lower).

Joe
> 
> I'm hoping I will not run into similar issues when I try to load balance IIS
> 4.0 at a later date.
> 
> thanks for any further input (-:
> 
> Michael McConnell
> 
> 

--
Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>