LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: How to install ethernet card?

To: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: How to install ethernet card?
From: "Eric Hsu" <erichsu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 00:53:06 -0700
HI Michael,
I am so sorry to make you nosiy because of keeping to ask basic questions. I
will check more on the news group as what u said. Thanks for your offering.

Eric

----- Original Message -----
From: Michael <lyxmoo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Joe Cooper <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: How to install ethernet card?


> We are not News group but LVS.
> THX
> ----- Original Message -----
> ·¢¼þÈË: Joe Cooper <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ÊÕ¼þÈË: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ·¢ËÍʱ¼ä: 2000Äê8ÔÂ4ÈÕ 2:05
> Ö÷Ìâ: Re: How to install ethernet card?
>
>
> > The Tulip driver had problems in the past, but the most recent .91(some
> > letter) and above fixes those problems entirely.  We use NetGear 310's
> > with the standard kernel net driver in every box we sell--except dual
> > port 1U servers which must have a dual port Intel card--and they work
> > perfectly.  And fast.
> >
> > The NetGear driver also works well...but the changes NetGear made to
> > Donald's driver now appear to be a standard part of Donald's driver.
> >
> > Just chiming in in defense of darn good network cards (and drivers). ;-)
> >
> > Joseph Mack wrote:
> > >
> > > I've got Netgear FA310TX's here and they don't work real well on
Donald's
> > > driver (although I can't remember what the problem was, bad netpipe
tests
> > > at least) :-(
> > >
> > > I had to go to Netgear's site to get their modified driver. Presumably
> > > this is the file he has here.
> > >
> > > Joe
> > > --
> > > Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >                                   --
> >                      Joe Cooper <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >                  Affordable Web Caching Proxy Appliances
> >                         http://www.swelltech.com
> >
> >
> >
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>