lvs-users
|
To: | thomas.hoelsken@xxxxxx |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: (drbd) Re: Many thanks for help! One last question ;-) |
Cc: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
From: | John Cronin <jsc3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:22:34 -0400 (EDT) |
Then I think NFS will be your only hope, at any kind of reasonable cost. GFS will work, but you will need dual attached disk storage, which isn't all that cheap. So, how stable is the current NFS on Linux? Is there a particular implementation that is stable (ie won't lose data) and has good performance? DRBD is most useful in a HA failover cluster. -- John Cronin |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: I thought I had it done, but the LVS backup node will notovertake!, Raj Dutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: (drbd) Re: Many thanks for help! One last question ;-), Joseph Mack |
Previous by Thread: | Re: (drbd) Re: Many thanks for help! One last question ;-), thomas . hoelsken |
Next by Thread: | Re: (drbd) Re: Many thanks for help! One last question ;-), Joseph Mack |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |