|
Dear John Cronin,
> > I have setup a primary node, a backup node and two
> > real servers for my LVS. However, if not mistaken, I
> > know that piranha canot handle lvs and failover at the
> > same time. Is there any solutions to make lvs and
> > failover possible at the same time?
>
> I am not clear what you are trying to accomplish here. If you
> want failover between the primary LVS directory, and the backup,
> my impression is that Piranha should in fact handle that properly.
> Otherwise, what would be the point of having a backup director?
>
> I think it is in the realservers where you can have load balancing,
> or failover, but not both. That is moot however, since with nanny
> and a loadbalancing Piranha setup, failed servers are supposed
> to be removed from the routing table, which is failover as far
> as a load balancing service is concerned. Failover is just
> a way of using a third party (the director) to heartbeat two
> services and control failover between them.
What I mean is when I configure the failover between primary and backup
node using piranha, it is doing failover only. The primary or the backup
(when primary is fail) node didn't do the load balancing to the 2 real
servers. Is there any ways that I want to have failover between the
primary and backup node, and at the same time, when requests come in,
load balancing is functioning. (The primary or the backup will load
balance the requests to the real servers)
Thank you
|
