![]() |
lvs-users
|
| Subject: | testlvs - 2nd question |
|---|---|
| Cc: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| From: | Thomas Proell <Thomas.Proell@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 8 Nov 2000 21:26:12 +0100 (MET) |
Hi! Testlvs is up and running now, bringing an average of 2600 packets per second on pentium machines under tcp. 40 Bytes per packet - that would make about 10 kBps on a 10MBps line (yes, ten Mega :) Adding load on any of the machines doesn't change the performance. Where's the bottleneck? The NICs? The collisions? How does testLVS work? How can I influence the number of active connections? I can influnce the number of simulated clients, but this is a different question. Thomas |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | re: data piping, Michael McConnell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Some doubts about LVS, John Cronin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Q: testLVS, Julian Anastasov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: testlvs - 2nd question, Julian Anastasov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |