|
i am new to lvs, well i installed lvs in the summer on two of our severs
but, had to deinstall it because multiple lvs support didn't work. so now i
am back and installed lvs 1.0.0 for kernel 2.2.17 on a original red hat
distribution.
does ipvsadm 1.0.0. for kernel 2.2.17 report IPS and ports in hex where
0.96, I think it was reports the ip in dotted form. Or did I do something
wrong? BTW what version do you guys recommend for a mission critical
cluster?
-----Original Message-----
From: Wenzhuo Zhang [mailto:wenzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 10:04 PM
To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 2.2.18
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 11:18:11AM +0100, smajer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>
> Hi All
>
> I guess only the following changes are necessary to successfully aplly
against
> 2.2.18
>
Agreed. I applied ipvs-1.02-2.2.17 against kernel 2.2.17 first and
then applied kernel patch-2.2.18. Everything works like a charm.
Wenzhuo
> --- ipvs-1.0.2-2.2.17.patch Sun Dec 3 05:39:27 2000
> +++ ipvs-1.0.2-2.2.18.patch Tue Dec 12 10:27:10 2000
> @@ -194,7 +194,8 @@
> @@ -271,6 +272,32 @@
> NET_IPV4_CONF_BOOTP_RELAY=10,
> NET_IPV4_CONF_LOG_MARTIANS=11,
> - NET_IPV4_CONF_HIDDEN=12
> + NET_IPV4_CONF_HIDDEN=12,
> + NET_IPV4_CONF_ARPFILTER=13
> +};
> +
> +/* /proc/sys/net/ipv4/vs */
>
>
>
> greetings
>
> stefan majer
> x-cellent technologies gmbh
> rosenkavalierplatz 5
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
