Re: (no subject) MASQ and LVS.

["Lorn Kay" <lorn_kay@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

From the LVS Howto section 7.1:

"Possibly a group of machines on a private network (like the
servers in a VS-NAT setup) would already be connected to the
outside world by NAT. Both the regular NAT and reverse NAT used
in VS-NAT are configured in the same rc.lvs_nat file."

In other words, the Director in a NAT configuration is using IPCHAINS to build a MASQ network.

I can not comment specifically on squid and socks however.

 

--K

>From: Florin Andrei

>Reply-To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

>To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

>Subject: (no subject)

>Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 10:14:36 -0800 (PST)

>

>Suppose i have built a VS using NAT. The load balancer

>box is also the gateway for my intranet, so i have 3

>NICs on the balancer: one to the intranet, one to the

>real servers, and one to the Internet.

>Is it OK to simultaneously use LVS and masquerade on

>the balancer? I mean, i wanna use the LVS for proxy

>(Squid) and socks (yeah, i know... :-)) - these two

>services will run on the real servers - and just

>masquerade everything else.

>Does LVS conflicts with masquerade in some way?

>

>(I suppose i'll have to masquerade also the Squids and

>the socks for their outbound traffic, but if LVS and

>masquerade can play well together, then i think this

>will not be an issue)

>

>--

>Florin Andrei

>

>

>__________________________________________________

>Do You Yahoo!?

>Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.

>http://shopping.yahoo.com/

>

>_______________________________________________

>LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

>Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

>or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

---

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com