|
That works! Now, I see *no* problems whatsoever. IMHO, this is a big win in
getting LVS up FAST and should be part of the mini-how-to!! I will be
testing for Julian to see what the tcpdump stuff gives (and learn something
too!)
I will be attempting more "complex" settings next, ultimately moving it to a
production enviroment.
Next on my list is to add a secod real server. It would be easiest to use
the current director. I think I saw something about this in the How-To,
something about Julian getting code to work with it. Does this work yet, and
if so, how is it done?
Then, get mon working on this simple 1 Network LVS.
Then, as I already have the director and realserver communicating through
the serial port, and I have to NICs on each UP, I assume that adding a
second director and using "heartbeat" between them to isn't to tough.
Finally, I think for me it is best to use VS-DRin my environment, as I have
a FBSD, Linux and Win2000 AS environment in production. I assume that for
VS-DR one *must* use the two network approach?
Thx Joe,
Regards,
Ivan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Mack" <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 7:16 PM
Subject: Re: Setting up a one network VS-NAT LVS
> > >
> > > director:# ipchains -A forward -p tcp -j MASQ -s realserver_name
> > service -d
> > > 0.0.0.0/0
> >
> > If I have already entered:
> > [root@wee2 httpd]# ipchains -A forward -j MASQ -s 192.168.168.0/24 -d
> > 0.0.0.0/0
> >
> > *and* I now enter your ipchains command above, will the new one override
the
> > old one? Or do they both become in effect, matching the last one, etc?
> >
> clear your ipchains tables (man ipchains) then run the command I gave
>
> > > where service = telnet, http
> > >
> > > My configure script (on the web site) does this for you.
> > > It doesn't handle the 1 net VS-NAT LVS (yet). To do this
> > > you'll need to run the send_redirects on the director,
> > > and set up the routes on the real-servers(s) first.
> >
> > I think I have already done this, as it was part of your e-mail that
stared
> > this thread, no?
>
> yes
>
> Joe
>
> --
> Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
|
