Re: [PATCH][RFC]: followup ...

[Roberto Nibali <ratz@xxxxxx>]

Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> 
> Roberto Nibali wrote:
> 
> > >         I agree, some firewalling can be done before the balancer
> > > but when the normally looking traffic comes only the balancer knows
> > > for open/closed ports, related ICMP, etc. The main things
> >
> > Unless you put a proxying firewall ;)
> 
> In which case you should not need LVS for load balancing...

Could you please elaborate on this statement?

Best regards,
Roberto Nibali, ratz

-- 
mailto: `echo NrOatSz@xxxxxxxxx | sed 's/[NOSPAM]//g'`