LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: 2.4 LVS-NAT config question

To: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.4 LVS-NAT config question
Cc: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 08:22:11 -0500
Julian Anastasov wrote:

> > in 2.4.x VS-NAT, are all ports from the real-server masqueraded or only
> > the ports for the services that LVS is controlling?
> 
>         LVS masquerades only its connections, even in 2.2.


In 2.2.x, I setup VS-NAT by running ipvsadm commands for a service
and then a complementary ipchains command like

ipchains -A forward -p tcp -j MASQ -s realserver_name service_name -d 0.0.0.0/0

to demasquerade the service.

Are you saying this wasn't neccessary in 2.2.x?

Joe

-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center, 
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>