Re: is SMP 0.2.11-2.4.3 OK?

To:	Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: is SMP 0.2.11-2.4.3 OK?
Cc:	Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From:	Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 27 Apr 2001 00:32:03 +0000 (GMT)

        Hello Joe,

On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Joseph Mack wrote:

> I just changed over to an SMP director. The
> 0.2.11-2.4.3 runs fine on a UMP machine. I get
> errors with depmod -a (unresolved symbols in these files)

        May be the __SMP__ flag in ipvs/Makefile:

#SMPFLAGS= -D__SMP__

May be -DMODVERSIONS in CFLAGS too?

What is the CONFIG_MODVERSIONS value in .config ?

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Newbie: LVS-DR on 2.4.3, Scott Jones Re: Newbie: LVS-DR on 2.4.3, Scott Jones Re: Newbie: LVS-DR on 2.4.3, Joseph Mack Re: Newbie: LVS-DR on 2.4.3, Joseph Mack Re: Newbie: LVS-DR on 2.4.3, Scott Jones Re: Newbie: LVS-DR on 2.4.3, Joseph Mack Message not available Message not available Message not available is SMP 0.2.11-2.4.3 OK?, Joseph Mack Re: is SMP 0.2.11-2.4.3 OK?, Horms Re: is SMP 0.2.11-2.4.3 OK?, Julian Anastasov <= Re: is SMP 0.2.11-2.4.3 OK?, Joseph Mack Re: is SMP 0.2.11-2.4.3 OK?, Joseph Mack Re: is SMP 0.2.11-2.4.3 OK?, simon Re: is SMP 0.2.11-2.4.3 OK?, Joseph Mack Re: is SMP 0.2.11-2.4.3 OK?, simon Re: Newbie: LVS-DR on 2.4.3, Joseph Mack Re: Newbie: LVS-DR on 2.4.3, Scott Jones

Previous by Date:	Re: is SMP 0.2.11-2.4.3 OK?, Horms
Next by Date:	Real Server not balancing to the backup server, Xavier Mertens
Previous by Thread:	Re: is SMP 0.2.11-2.4.3 OK?, Horms
Next by Thread:	Re: is SMP 0.2.11-2.4.3 OK?, Joseph Mack
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]