![]() |
lvs-users
|
| To: | "'lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: Security of VS-NAT versus VS-DR ? |
| From: | Peter Mueller <pmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 3 May 2001 11:18:19 -0700 |
> Running beta load-balancing software on the box that feeds us > all internet services is NOT a good idea. Ooops. Apologies to the list, I certainly didn't mean to imply LVS was 'bad code' or insecure, and I think it might have come out that way. (I think LVS kicks ass!) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Security of VS-NAT versus VS-DR ?, Peter Mueller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Security of VS-NAT versus VS-DR ?, Joseph Mack |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Security of VS-NAT versus VS-DR ?, Jon Burford |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Security of VS-NAT versus VS-DR ?, Joseph Mack |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |