LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: Security of VS-NAT versus VS-DR ?

To: "'lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Security of VS-NAT versus VS-DR ?
From: Peter Mueller <pmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 11:18:19 -0700
> Running beta load-balancing software on the box that feeds us 
> all internet services is NOT a good idea.  

Ooops.

Apologies to the list, I certainly didn't mean to imply LVS was 'bad code'
or insecure, and I think it might have come out that way.  (I think LVS
kicks ass!)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>