|
Hello,
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Joseph Mack wrote:
> Julian Anastasov wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
>
> > I'm not sure what the kernel will decide in this situation but
> > don't rely on the fact some processes will not be killed :) There is
> > a constant network activity and a need for memory for
> > packets (floods/bursts).
>
> what about returning to a hash table with fixed upper size?
There is nothing to return to. May be you are talking about
a new sysctl var in /proc/.../vs/conn_limit ?
> Joe
> --
> Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
> contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center,
> mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
|
