LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: foundry vs. lvs

To: "'lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx '" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: foundry vs. lvs
From: Peter Mueller <pmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 10:35:33 -0700
Radu >If I were to choose some black box
Radu >as a load balancer I would chose
Radu >CISCO LocalDirector, but again $$$$
Radu >is not an endless resource. Features of
Radu >foundry look nice, but they only 
Radu >remain nice on paper.

I've got two Cisco Localdirector boxes under lease doing nothing since our
switchover to LVS.  If you're interested in subleasing them, let me know :P.

I'd avoid Intel, Foundry, and Localdirectors like the *PLAGUE*.  Arrowpoints
& BigIPs are the only reliable commercial offerings.  (If one person on an
informed mailing list tells me a product sucks (Foundry load balancer) ... I
believe them until I hear a success story from someone else).....


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>