|
Hello,
> I was hopingthat there were some more people using nanny on this list,
There are, but most of them are posting to the piranha mailinglist ;)
> because except to the Piranha-GUI the Redhat HA-packages provide a nice
> way to setup a cluster. It provides a single configuration file which
> makes it easy to configure.
But obviously doesn't provide the freedom of functionality.
> Sorry, but they stilldon't provide this function. In fact, the resulting
> error messages are not a real problem, but I don't like web servers
> spitting out an error message every six seconds :-)
Then maybe you could lower the healthchecking time. A note to the
piranha developers, if this is really the case. You should make
the application as open as possible, allowing 3rd party users to
hook healthchecking functions on their wish. You define the API,
consisting of how the healthcheck should be performed and what
you expect as return value to proceed with further analysis. Like
this Mario could hook for example a simple SSL healthchecker like
http_get and would not suffer from annoying error logs.
> Subscribing to the piranha-list could help, I think I'll try that.
Do that but I cannot imagine that his functionality really isn't
built in piranha.
Best regards,
Roberto Nibali, ratz
--
mailto: `echo NrOatSz@xxxxxxxxx | sed 's/[NOSPAM]//g'`
|
