|
Sorry, my english was not on the top of my abilities there - I meant that
the route-noarp.txt should include documentation on both the
iproute2-noarp-1.diff and hidden-2.4.5-1.diff, since it is supposedly the
only documet describing the patches in that page, or sumply another text
file should be added , describing usage of the hidden-2.4.5-1.diff. it may
be a couple of lines, but may make someone's live easier.
Alex.
-------Original Message-------
From: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Monday, September 17, 2001 11:20:35
To: Alex Kramarov
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: the arp problem
Hello,
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Alex Kramarov wrote:
> The only thing i could suggest that maybe, the file
>
> http://linuxvirtualserver.org/~julian/route-noarp.txt
>
> did include the description of using Julians patch without the
> iproute2-noarp-1.diff
>
> on the page http://linuxvirtualserver.org/~julian/
You want route-noarp.txt to include info about applying
iproute2-noarp-1.diff? (sorry, my english is bad).
BTW, currently, this kind of solving the ARP problem is not the
easiest one to use - we have to change link routes (to mark them
noarp), etc. The LVS users prefer the hidden flag.
|
