![]() |
lvs-users
|
| To: | <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Joseph Mack" <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: LVS and ethernet Bridgeing |
| From: | "Serge Sozonoff" <serge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 27 Sep 2001 23:24:32 +0100 |
Hi,
>the client sends a packet with src=CIP, dst=VIP (abbreviated
CIP->VIP),
>the realserver receives a packet with the dst rewritten
(CIP->RIP). The
>realserver replies (RIP->CIP). If this arrives at the client
directly
>(as happens when you don't have the director as the default gw
of the realservers),
>the packet is not recognised at part of any request the client
made.
>The reply packets have to be masqueraded on the way out.
Hmmm, I see what you are saying.
I am trying to figure out how Cisco do this, because this is
what they do in the Cisco LocalDirector and it works. I will investigate
further.
Serge
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LVS and ethernet Bridgeing, Joseph Mack |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LVS and NFS, Horms |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LVS and ethernet Bridgeing, Joseph Mack |
| Next by Thread: | RE: LVS and ethernet Bridgeing, Radu-Adrian Feurdean |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |