|  | 
lvs-users
 | 
| To: | <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Joseph Mack" <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: LVS and ethernet Bridgeing | 
| From: | "Serge Sozonoff" <serge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
| Date: | Thu, 27 Sep 2001 23:24:32 +0100 | 
| Hi,
        >the client sends a packet with src=CIP, dst=VIP (abbreviated
CIP->VIP),
        >the realserver receives a packet with the dst rewritten
(CIP->RIP). The
        >realserver replies (RIP->CIP). If this arrives at the client
directly
        >(as happens when you don't have the director as the default gw
of the realservers),
        >the packet is not recognised at part of any request the client
made.
        >The reply packets have to be masqueraded on the way out.
        Hmmm, I see what you are saying.
        I am trying to figure out how Cisco do this, because this is
what they do in the Cisco LocalDirector and it works. I will investigate
        further.
        Serge
 | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LVS and ethernet Bridgeing, Joseph Mack | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LVS and NFS, Horms | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LVS and ethernet Bridgeing, Joseph Mack | 
| Next by Thread: | RE: LVS and ethernet Bridgeing, Radu-Adrian Feurdean | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |