|
Hi Joe,
Yes, Adrian did mention this in an earlier posts.
>Probably if you do proxy-arp on the director with the default gateway's
>address it may work. That way you have bridging in one direction
(defgw->RS)
>and routing in the other (RS-proxyarp->director->defgw)
I think I will try both methods, starting with ethernet bridging as this
reflects closest the behavior of the Cisco LD (I think).
Thanks,
Serge
> ----------
> From: Joseph Mack
> Reply To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2001 12:35
> To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: raf@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: LVS and ethernet Bridgeing
>
> Serge Sozonoff wrote:
>
> > I have had a look here
> http://bridge.sourceforge.net/devel/bridge-nf/
> > and their apears to be a kernel patch for 2.4.x
> > that does just this, bridging combined with netfilter/iptables
>
>
> I assume you know about the proxy arp method. I don't know
> about its compatibility with iptables.
>
> Joe
> --
> Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
> contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center,
> mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
>
|
