|
Hi,
I'm curious. Is there already someone evaluating or even using ktcpvs in a
real production environment?
Any additions or experiences to share?
greets
Bjoern
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wensong Zhang" <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:22 AM
Subject: ktcpvs 0.0.3 available
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The ktcpvs-0.0.3 tar ball is available on the LVS website.
>
>
> Kernel TCP Virtual Server - Version 0.0.3 - October 11, 2001
>
> 2001-10-10 Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> * Changed to use [gs]etsockopt to manipulate TCPVS inside the
> kernel (through netfilter sockopt register), so that it is
> possible to merge IPVS and TCPVS code together in the future.
>
> * Code tide up, such as removing the code of reading and writing
> proc files, and adding/refining data structures.
>
> * tcpvsadm is updated to a new version.
>
> Added the libtcpvs library to manipulate TCPVS.
>
> Rewrote most code of tcpvsadm.c to use libtcpvs to interact with
> TCPVS inside the kernel.
>
> 2001-09-22 Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> * tcp_vs_sched.c: add the including of head file <linux/interrupt>
> to avoid the compiling error that `do_softirq' is undeclared.
>
> * tcp_vs_http.c (parse_http_header): add type into min marco
> call, so that it can be compiled in kernel 2.4.9.
>
> 2001-05-18 Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> * replace sched->refcnt with sched->module use count for tcpvs
> scheduler references.
>
>
> Note that this version is much better than the early ones, but it is still
> in early development, the performance hasn't be optimized, there are few
> schedulers, and it is probably not safe on SMP.
>
> As always, bugreports, fixes, comments and suggestions are welcome.
>
> Wensong
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
>
|
