Tao Zhao wrote:
>
> The section did raise the same question in experiment 3, but no answer is
> given.
the question has been out there for 2yrs and no-one knows (or at least
is telling us) the answer.
> Still I have those same questions:
> 1. Why setting VIP at dummy0 only didn't work? (some route rule needed?)
dummy0 doesn't work for tunl in 2.2 kernels and presumably 2.4 kernels (but
does in 2.0).
> 2. What's the relation between tunl0 and dummy0?
they're different devices, like ppp0 and eth0 are different devices.
> 3. Can I give multiple VIPs to tul0? I know I can do that to dummy0, but
> since dummy0 didn't work ...
I'd say you didn't put successfully put it on dummy0 then.
No-one has tried it with tunl0. I would expect it will
work, but since no-one has tried it, we still don't know yet if it works.
Joe
--
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center,
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA
|