lvs-users
|
To: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LVS & Squid. |
From: | Martin Hamilton <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 15 Nov 2001 00:14:39 +0000 |
Joseph Mack writes: | what is carrying 120Mbps? clearly not a single FE Well, in a manner of speaking :-) We have three cache clusters, each of which is hung off a Cisco 3524 with a Gigabit (SX) link into the nearest JANET backbone router. Each cluster is running in IP tunnelling mode, so only the client-to-service-IP-address traffic passes through the load balancer. The real-server-to-client traffic doesn't go through the load balancer. I've been playing with Gigabit Fibre NICs for our campus firewalls recently, but that's another story... Cheers, Martin |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: Questions about LVS prior to implementation, Peter Mueller |
---|---|
Next by Date: | stopping 'pulse' doesn't unbind from UDP 539 (heartbeat), Gonzalo Servat |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LVS & Squid., Joseph Mack |
Next by Thread: | ipvs-0.9.6 single patch against kernel 2.4.13, Wensong Zhang |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |