LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: IP_MASQ:could not get free masq entry (free=31894).

To: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IP_MASQ:could not get free masq entry (free=31894).
From: "Hendrik Thiel" <thiel@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 18:47:30 +0100
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Laurent Lefoll <Laurent.Lefoll@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
An: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Datum: Dienstag, 20. November 2001 18:43
Betreff: Re: IP_MASQ:could not get free masq entry (free=31894).


>I was confronted with that kind of problem and in my case it was because of
too
>many simultaneous DNS requests to the same DNS server. Maybe you could
check on
>that side...
yes, thats the problem :). Thanks. And thanks to Julian.

>
>Just my small contribution...
>
>Laurent
>
>
>> > IP_MASQ:ip_masq_new(proto=UDP): could not get free masq entry
(free=31894).
>> > IP_MASQ:ip_masq_new(proto=UDP): could not get free masq entry
(free=31894).
>> > IP_MASQ:ip_masq_new(proto=UDP): could not get free masq entry
(free=31888).
>>
>>         It seems you are flooding some remote host from an internal
>> box, UDP protocol.
>>
>> > I thought that the lvs and the masq table are two different things.
What
>> > exactly
>> > does that mean? Is it possible that the fast and big amount of new
>> > connections
>> > did that?
>>
>>         www is TCP, you reach the UDP limit per destination (4096),
>> there are still free UDP ports for other destinations.
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>