![]() |
lvs-users
|
| To: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Schedulers |
| From: | Fabrice <fabrice@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 15 Dec 2001 17:20:13 +0100 |
Hello,
If I use something like that:
[Internet]
|
|
[LVS Box]
|
+--------+-------+
| |
[Firewall 1] [Firewall 2]
| |
+--------+-------+
|
|
[LAN]
As I understand, the SH scheduler let's you be
sure that a connexion coming from the LAN and
going through Firewall 2 will get the LVS-Box to
redirect all receiving packets for that connection
to Firewall 2.
What's wrong in having the returned packets to
go trough Firewall 1, TCP/IP allows differents routes
for the packets, and in both case the client will
receive the packet (simply not from the same
Firewall).
Thanks,
Fabrice Bucher
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: UDP trouble with DNS setup., Julian Anastasov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Schedulers, Lars Marowsky-Bree |
| Previous by Thread: | Need comments. The most economic GE director., Chanik Jo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Schedulers, Lars Marowsky-Bree |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |