LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: LVS-patch for kernel 2.2.20

To: " - *lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: LVS-patch for kernel 2.2.20
From: andreas.hartmann@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 08:28:56 +0100
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 4 Jan 2002 andreas.hartmann@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>
>> I'm running here since half a year linuxvirtualserver / tunneling (2
directors,
>> 2 realserver) within a security zone as ftp-server for about 22000 clients.
>> The availability since that time has been 100% :-). Better then all
S390-based
>> applications in our bussines!
>> The peak the system has to manage are about 20000 connects / filetransfers in
>> 15 minutes!
>>
>
> It's good to hear that you have used LVS successfully for some time.

I hope, it will last the next years :-)!


>> I've got an additional question:
>> Is it possible to manage / distribute in the mentioned system clients, which
>> come via masquerading from firewall? This means, they all would come with the
>> same source IP.
>> I think it shouldn't work because of the persistent option, which I need for
>> ftp. All connects would be sent to the same realserver. Or am I wrong?
>
>
> Yes, if the persistent option is setup, all the connections from the same
> source IP (such as the masqerading box) will be sent to the same server.
> In the layer-4, there is no way to identify which connections are related,
> unless we go to the application-layer then maybe we can get some info
> (such as http cookie in the web application).

I feared I would be right - I liked it, if you told me, I would be wrong! :-)


Have a nice week!
Regards,
Andreas Hartmann

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: LVS-patch for kernel 2.2.20, andreas . hartmann <=