|  | 
lvs-users
 | 
| To: | "'lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | LVS, mon, and heartbeat, who's in control? | 
| From: | Paul Lantinga <prl@xxxxxx> | 
| Date: | Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:22:12 -0500 | 
| Good morning, We're running the .8.x stable code. It works great in the default setup with one LVS server doing NAT. Phase II means trying out 2 load balancers, as found at http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/HighAvailability.html. This works fine using heartbeat to control lvs and mon in the manner found in the example haresources file.   clients -- switch -- lvs and lvs2 -- switch -- servers
 Of course, this killfest doesn't work b/c you can't have mon killing heartbeat and heartbeat killing mon as you're left with noone watching anything. ;) . So, I figured, how about having two mon instances or how about having mon control both heartbeat and lvs. The dual mon setup would be:
 - a second instance of mon would be started at boot time and would monitor the gateways hostgroup using a mon.cf with:
   watch gateways
 The mon in control scenario would be:
 Is either of these methods preferable? wise? unwise? Has anyone else managed to get 2 instances of mon running on the same box? Is anyone using mon to control heartbeat and lvs? thanks, Paul L. | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: lvs-nat & SNAT, Julian Anastasov | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LVS, mon, and heartbeat, who's in control?, Joseph Mack | 
| Previous by Thread: | Multiple routing types in one lvs?, Michael Cunningham | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: LVS, mon, and heartbeat, who's in control?, Joseph Mack | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |