LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: clustering difference between lvs and mosix

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: clustering difference between lvs and mosix
From: "Joseph R. Hoot" <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 13 Feb 2002 14:30:51 -0800
So LVS is basically and advanced way of doing DNS round robin stuff--
similar to Cisco's LocalDirector?


On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 14:05, Roberto Nibali wrote:
> Hello Joe,
> 
> > I understand the differences between Beowulf and Mosix.  With Beowulf, 
> > each process of a "cluster compiled" application can be load balanced 
> > across all clustered servers.  With Mosix, each process of an 
> > application or thread will be executed on the cluster node that is least 
> > used (Has resources available).  In these types of situations, where 
> 
> Oh, thanks, this is by far the nicest explanation I've ever read. This 
> makes perfectly sense now. Thanks.
> 
> > does LVS fit in?  Does an application have to be compiled to use header 
> > files from LVS (aka PVM style)?  Is it application independant and more 
> > kernel clustering?
> 
> None, actually, IMHO. You define clustering and load sharing, LVS does 
> traffic load balancing. No processes are involved. It's mainly to have 
> redundancy and load balancing on the network level. The application 
> level behind a LVS cluster can then again be load balanced/shared with a 
> Beowulf/Mosix cluster.
> 
> > The best situation that I would be looking for is where I wouldn't have 
> > to recompile any applications and that it would load balance 
> > applications (single processes) across multiple nodes.
> 
> You can't load balance application load, but you can load balance the 
> incoming traffic that hits the server those applications are running and 
> thus indirectly load balance application load but you have almost no 
> influence on the load balancing of the application load.
> 
> > I've already decided to go with Mosix unless LVS does a similar thing, 
> > in which case I will probably try LVS instead.
> 
>  From reading your email I get the impression you definitely need load 
> sharing and thus either Mosix or Beowulf. I stand corrected but you need 
> to provide a rough idea of what you intend to do, how does your 
> application work?
> 
> HTH and tell me if it doesn't make sense,
> Roberto Nibali, ratz
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>