![]() |
lvs-users
|
| To: | "'lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | KTCPVS |
| From: | Jimmy Yeung <JYeung@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 25 Mar 2002 16:11:19 -0500 |
|
Can anyone tell me if the following will work? I know it may defeat the whole purpose of load balance at layer 4, but I just need something to simulate BigIP kinda stuffs. Client -> SSL -> KTCPVS -> Apache (which terminate SSL by listen 2 virtual IP) -> Real Servers KTCPVS & Apache (with 2 virtual IP) are in the same physical linux box. I understand that same certificate needs to be used for both virtual IP of the apache. Will this work? Once I add the KTCPVS patch to existing LVS patched kernel source ... then compile it. Is that mean this new compiled kernel can only do KTCPVS? Is it configurable between KTCPVS & LVS? ... without using 2 different kernels by selecting from LILO? Thanks so lot guys,
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: problems with ipvs 1.0.1 and kernel 2.4.18, Jimmy Yeung |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: problems with ipvs 1.0.1 and kernel 2.4.18, Paul Lantinga |
| Previous by Thread: | problems with ipvs 1.0.1 and kernel 2.4.18, Tinu Patel |
| Next by Thread: | Re: KTCPVS, Alexandre CASSEN |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |