|
Add "Debian packages" to that "instead of documentation" list. :)
Chris Kalin
System Administrator
Netwurx, Inc.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Mueller" <pmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 08:03 PM
Subject: RE: High Availability
> > Ultra Monkey is somewhat out of date, supporting RH 6.x, and
> > 2.2.x kernels.
> > I have been considering updating this given recent requests for
> > a free alternative to do Load Balancing and/or HA straight out of the
> > box.
> >
> > As we are talking about this I'd like to do a bit of market research
> > to find out what people think Ultra Monkey should do. In particular
> > would people be happy with a set of Debian packages (yes, I'm using
> > Debian instead of a Red Hat variant these days) and documentation
> > or is there a need for something else?
>
> I don't know about other people, but I'm using RH6.2/VA machines for my
LVS
> cluster. I bet people would rather see RH6.2 & RH7.2 packages than
updated
> documentation...
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
|
