lvs-users
|
To: | "'lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'mack@xxxxxxxxxxxx '" <mack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: transparent redirect for a certain netblock? |
From: | Peter Mueller <pmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 17 Apr 2002 15:23:27 -0700 |
> > > Can I solve this problem with packet marking? I have a setup > > > in production (keepalived, mon, transparent redirects on > > > application servers) and I would rather not modify if possible. it turns out packet marking _IS_ the solution. this is an awesome tool! Julian supplied the recipe. I owe him many many beers. If anyone is curious, here it is.. <recipe> ipchains -A input -p TCP -s $client -d VIP 80 -m 1 -j ACCEPT ipvsadm -A -f 1 -s wlc ipvsadm -a -f 1 -r $real_server # rest of ipvsadm stuff goes next... </recipe> cheers & good day Peter |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: LVS Beginner's question., Michael E Brown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LVS with JAVA RMI Registry?, jlobascher |
Previous by Thread: | RE: transparent redirect for a certain netblock?, Peter Mueller |
Next by Thread: | RE: transparent redirect for a certain netblock?, mack@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |