LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Question about LVS-DR setup

To: "'lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Question about LVS-DR setup
From: djo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 15:31:42 -0700
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 02:10:48PM -0700, Peter Mueller wrote:
> > If that is the case, how can that one interface both listen 
> > to incoming
> > requests on the public IP's subnet, let's say for the sake of example
> > 66.111.111.111, and then send packets to a real server on the 
> > internal subnet,
> > for example 192.168.1.10?  Seems to me you can't do that 
> > without 2 NICs.
> 
> Once again the example you are talking about is LVS-NAT, _NOT_ LVS-DR as you
> reference.  LVS-DR involves no NAT/masq/address translation and generally is
> setup on a public IP range for convenience or simplicity.
> 
> You're trying to make this too complex.  It looks like you are very much
> confusing LVS terms and jumbling your firewall setup in the middle for kicks
> :P.  Get out notepad or visio and write down your setup, it will help.  Then
> I would proceed as follows...
> 
> 1.) setup LVS box for LVS-NAT using configure script from Joseph Mack.  Make
> sure you give the LVS box a public IP and a private ip.

But the basic question I have is unanswered even in the the lvs-nat section
of the HOWTO: how is outside traffic supposed to get to a VIP configured
with a live network address if the actual ethernet interface is configured
for a private subnet?  Or do I need 2 NICs?  But the HOWTO only mentions one
NIC and one VIP...

> 2.) firewall requests going to the public IP to the LVS box if you want;
> just make sure desired traffic actually gets there.  I would recommend
> starting with low or no security and after you get it working strengthen
> your setup.
> 3.) drink a beer to celebrate :P


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>