![]() |
lvs-users
|
| To: | Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Inactive connections |
| Cc: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| From: | Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 01 Aug 2002 07:31:34 -0400 |
Horms wrote: > I would think that a good solution would be to a) advocate the > use of '-n' and b) mention that seting up resolution - through DNS, > /etc/hosts or whatever - is a good idea. I've added a note in the (next) HOWTO. Since I don't like having a default route on LVS-DR directors, and only the realservers need to be resolved, I'm pushing the /etc/hosts solution Joe -- Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center, mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: high availability between real servers ?, Julian Anastasov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: high availability between real servers ?, Joseph Mack |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Inactive connections, Horms |
| Next by Thread: | Re: high availability between real servers ?, Alex Kramarov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |