lvs-users
|
To: | <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Syn floods and DOS protection |
From: | "Alex Kramarov" <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 3 Sep 2002 16:19:37 +0200 |
i have read the docs, and i saw that all the security and dos protection features in LVS are aimed at protecting the director. the setup assumes that the real servers can take care for themselvs, either by using syncookies or by some other means. is there a solution for real servers that do not implement syncookies ? On some of my servers i am stack with w2k. I know there is a syncookies firewall for kernel 2.2, but i am using 2.4 ... Thank you. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LVS with Ldirectord (UltraMonkey) problems, Martijn Klingens |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: telnet but no http???, Jonathan D. Proulx |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LVS with Ldirectord (UltraMonkey) problems, Martijn Klingens |
Next by Thread: | Re: Syn floods and DOS protection, Julian Anastasov |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |