|
The colo doesn't provide any firewall.
is having the director and the firewall on
the same box not a valid configuration?
has anyone else used this type of configuration?
(LVS_NAT http, ftp with iptables... on the same system)
-----Original Message-----
From: Martijn Klingens [mailto:mklingens@xxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 3:05 AM
To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: iptables and lvs_nat
On Wednesday 02 October 2002 17:41, Tim Cronin wrote:
> due to the economic down turn, and limited space at the co lo,
> the director and firewall will be living on the same box. I don't
> get to make these decisions, I just get to implement...
Hmm, and the colo people themselves don't offer stateful firewall services
either? I'm not too familiar with colo, we're hosting our machines
ourselves...
Otherwise you'll have to live with what you have. It's not the end of the
world, but it's not Walhalla either ;-)
--
Martijn
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
