|
Tim Cronin wrote:
>
> Hey no problem, I must say that this is the most cordial and helpful
> mailing list I've been on.
I was on the perl mailing list for a while in 1996 and decided that the world
didn't need any more of what went on there.
> LVS has all ready
> saved me much time and money.
if you really like it, get your work to send some money to the FSF :-)
> >Yes, it is clearly the NF_STOLEN interaction of LVS in the NAT part of the
> code.
>
> this sounds like I might have opened a can of worms. :^D
worms need to be found
> should/can lvs and iptables both track state, what would be the impact of
> that?
look at
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/Joseph.Mack/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO-21.html#ss21.2
in the last section on tcp state.
Joe
--
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, SAIC contractor
to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center,
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA
|
