|
laurie.baker@xxxxxx wrote:
> Anyway, to resolve the issue the developers configured
> the webservers to have a default route of the loadbalancer, therefore
> squirting the return traffic back through the tunnel !
>
> Well! I have not seen this style of configuration for LVS / TUN
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/Joseph.Mack/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO-13.html#ss13.4
look at Julian's martian patches. These are for LVS-DR, but
I expect it will work if you can send packets back through
the tunnel. The patch just allows packets with src_addr
to be routed through the director.
you'll need to talk to Julian if you need to fix problems
running it on LVS-Tun
Joe
--
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, SAIC contractor
to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center,
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA
|
