lvs-users
|
To: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jgeorgeson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: iptables NAT and how it might affect ipvs |
From: | Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:55:18 -0400 |
Joseph Mack wrote: > > > > > -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.10.5/255.255.255.255 -o eth0:5 -j MASQUERADE > > -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.10.6/255.255.255.255 -o eth0:6 -j MASQUERADE > > -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.10.7/255.255.255.255 -o eth0:7 -j MASQUERADE I don't know that iptables works with ip aliases. I don't think that ipchains even did Joe -- Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, SAIC contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center, mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: lvs and PCAnywhere, Joseph Mack |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Toronto Area - Assistance Setting Up LVS, Chuck Mariotti |
Previous by Thread: | Re: iptables NAT and how it might affect ipvs, Joseph Mack |
Next by Thread: | ipvsadm and kernel 2.2.22 and apache load balancing, Marc-Christian Petersen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |