lvs-users
|
|
lvs-users
|
| To: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: wlc scheduling broken with servers with weight 0? |
| Cc: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| From: | Bradley McLean <bradlist@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 1 Nov 2002 14:12:21 -0500 |
* Julian Anastasov (ja@xxxxxx) [021101 13:57]: > > Why the next conn should use dest? least has weight 2 (may be > it is 2 times faster CPU). Yep, I see it now. Just having a slow brain day, I guess. Thanks! -Brad |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: lvs doesn't seem to be clearing/Zeroring, Julian Anastasov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: lvs doesn't seem to be clearing/Zeroring, Tim Cronin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: wlc scheduling broken with servers with weight 0?, Julian Anastasov |
| Next by Thread: | IRC channel, Marc-Christian Petersen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |