LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: LVS-DR and fwmark, multiple director

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Leonard@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: LVS-DR and fwmark, multiple director
From: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 06:31:51 -0500
Leonard Soetedjo wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> In the HOWTO, I don't understand why does the director is "usually" VIP-less?
> Is it for performance or cleaner design? 

cleaner design - if you don't need something, then it's best not to have it. It
may bight you in some unexpected way in the future.

> Is it all right if the director has VIP?

with the current implementation of fwmark, you have to.
 
> is to FD1, if src_addr=VIP2, gw is FD2), is it workable?

sounds all right. 

Joe


-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, SAIC contractor 
to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center, 
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>