|
I'm not really bound by any of them. I was just stating for information
sake that 75 Mbits/s sustained is handled easily by a relatively small
machine.
Ramon Kagan
York University, Computing and Network Services
Unix Team - Intermediate System Administrator
(416)736-2100 #20263
rkagan@xxxxxxxx
-------------------------------------
I have not failed. I have just
found 10,000 ways that don't work.
- Thomas Edison
-------------------------------------
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Matthew S. Crocker wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Ramon Kagan wrote:
>
> > We use DR and just for information sake, a PIII 700 with 512 MB RAM holds
> > the bandwidth of about 75 Mbits sustained with little trouble. Average
> > workload is about 0.27 all day. Hope that helps.
>
> Are you CPU, memory or network bound? Most of the LVS stuff is done in
> the kernel and doesn't contribute to actual 'load' as shown from top.
>
> -Matt
>
> >
> > Ramon Kagan
> > York University, Computing and Network Services
> > Unix Team - Intermediate System Administrator
> > (416)736-2100 #20263
> > rkagan@xxxxxxxx
> >
> > -------------------------------------
> > I have not failed. I have just
> > found 10,000 ways that don't work.
> > - Thomas Edison
> > -------------------------------------
> >
> > On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, vecna@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > > > Ciao Vecna,
> > > > I'm especially honoured to see you on this mailinglist. I love BFi and I
> > > > will personally make sure you get premium support while setting up LVS.
> > > tnx :) in few time we must release some news :)
> > >
> > > > LVS-NAT or LVS-DR mode?
> > > LVS-DR
> > >
> > > > Are those 2 GB NICs planned for redundant Internet access?
> > > is a separated vlan, not for backuo line, we need behind the LVS
> > > 10-12 RS to work as IDS.
> > >
> > > I'm thinking only to divide the traffic between the IDSs, with a
> > > session tracking of LVS I think this could work fine ...
> > >
> > > "Matthew S. Crocker" <matthew@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > > > Personally I would go with a machine using two Gig Ethernets. Plug one
> > > > into a switch to break out the 100 mb connetions to the real servers.
> > > I think to use 10/12 cross wire for connect the IDSs directly
> > >
> > > > I would think it would be more memory bandwidth limited than
> > > > actual CPU power.
> > > maybe :) and LVS-DR don't required a lots of memory how could required
> > > LVS-NAT ... but what's about network device ? we are thinking to
> > > but three quad intel for contact the RS and two 3Com 35985 for external
> > > interface, did you know if those work correctly ?
> > >
> > > bye :)
> > > vecna
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
> >
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Matthew S. Crocker
> Vice President / Internet Division Email: matthew@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Crocker Communications Phone: (413) 746-2760
> PO BOX 710 Fax: (413) 746-3704
> Greenfield, MA 01302-0710 http://www.crocker.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
|
