LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: IP tunneling architecture issue

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: IP tunneling architecture issue
From: "Sergio Pantoja H." <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 20:23:04 -0300
Interested number One here :)

At 01:48 a.m. 16-12-02 +1100, you wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 02:03:45PM -0800, Peter Mueller wrote:
>> > We've never done this before. But if it works, it would sure increase
>> > our claimed reliability as we can talk about multihomed, 
>> > geographically
>> > separate, entirely redundant systems.
>> 
>> I think there were a few posts along this thread in the past.  There was
>> some talk about using BGP with LVS integration using a tool Horms wrote
>> called Supersparrow (http://www.supersparrow.org/).  I'm not sure if it's
>> production ready, but if it was that's your best choice by far.  Routing LVS
>> connections based on BGP is a great idea!
>
>It probably needs a bit of TLC but it is pretty simple so should work
>without too much bother. I'd be quite happy to work with someone to make
>this so. I'm using it myself on a very small (experimental) site wihtout
>too much bother.  I also have a patch to make it work with bind9 that
>I'm happy to send anyone who is interested.
>
>-- 
>Horms
>        
>
>_______________________________________________
>LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

Sergio Pantoja H.
sergio@xxxxxxxxxx
Linux Engineer
System, Network and Security Administrator
#user 245264 counter.li.org



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>