![]() |
lvs-users
|
| To: | "'Joseph Mack'" <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>, <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: A new load balancing algorithm for discussion and consideration |
| From: | "Marko Buuri" <marko@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 8 May 2003 12:52:45 +0300 |
> >It's great to have new ideas. The -SH scheduler came this way. >Do you have any interest in coding it up? > The changes I suggest to the existing WLC implementation are quite simple logically and coding wise: 1) compare with (jobs+1)/weight, not jobs/weight. Now WLC would behave like classic Shortest Expected Delay policy (SED). 2) return the first found server with current jobs=0, no matter the weight. This implements the Never Queue policy (NQ). Marko |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: A new load balancing algorithm for discussion and consideration, Marko Buuri |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Small packets handling : LVS-DR vs LVS-NAT, Nicolas Chiappero |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: A new load balancing algorithm for discussion and consideration, Joseph Mack |
| Next by Thread: | Re: A new load balancing algorithm for discussion and consideration, Wensong Zhang |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |