lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: module problem |
From: | Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 21 May 2003 09:07:12 +0900 |
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 11:55:50PM +0800, Wensong Zhang wrote: Hi Wensong, > The sltv2.index and sltv2.index are not consistent with sltimer_jiffies > too. So, the actual timer expiration delay is the number of jiffies/100 > at the time of loading ipvs module. Ahh I missed that, we could initialise them too. Though I agree that an easier way would be to just remove the line that initaliases sltimer_jiffies. It is probably only an advantage if the lvs module is loaded a _long_ time after the system boots. -- Horms |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [ANNOUNCE] ipvs 1.0.9, Wensong Zhang |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ANNOUNCE] ipvs 1.0.9, Horms |
Previous by Thread: | Re: module problem, Wensong Zhang |
Next by Thread: | redhat kernels and ipvs, Alex Kramarov |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |